Effectiveness and Efficiency of Implementation of Program-Based Budget and Budget Credibility

Authors

  • Maria Catarina da Cruz Institute of Business (IOB), Timor-Leste
  • Ni Luh Putu Wiagustini Faculty of Economic and Business, Universitas Udayana, Indonesia
  • Augusto Da Conceiçao Soares Institute of Business (IOB), Timor-Leste

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.56982/dream.v2i12.182

Keywords:

effectiveness, efficiency, credibility, budget absorption

Abstract

The full implementation of program-based budgeting offers financial advantages compared to budgeting based on line items. However, in the Ministry of Finance of Timor-Leste, this is not effectively and efficiently implemented, and it fails to maintain the budget's credibility. The main objective of this research is to assess the levels of effectiveness, efficiency, and budget credibility in the Ministry of Finance. To achieve this goal, a quantitative descriptive analysis method is employed. The results indicate that the average budget absorption for the years 2018-2022 has not been effective, with an implementation rate of 78.12%, signifying less effectiveness. The average efficiency level is considered efficient at 78.12%. However, this does not necessarily mean that most programs or activities have been successfully achieved; rather, it is due to some situations at that time that hindered proper implementation. Meanwhile, budget credibility in the context of budget implementation is considered less credible, with an average percentage of 78.12%. Looking at budget credibility from budget changes (additions or reductions), the average ratio is 5.99%, indicating less credibility over the five-year period. It is recommended that the Ministry of Finance of Timor-Leste provides adequate and regular training for its staff, conducts routine supervision, prepares performance reports, and ensures staff commitment in the budget planning process.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...

References

Abdurahman , A. (11 de June de 2012). https://scholar.google.com/scholar?q=Abdurrahman,+2012)+anggaran+stabil&hl=pt-PT&as_sdt=0&as_vis=1&oi=scholart. Recuperado el December de 2022, de Proposal%20Tesis%20S2/References/Abdurahman%20Aliyi-PBP.pdf

Bastian, I. (2013). Sistem Akuntansi Sektor Publik. Jakarta: Erlangga.

Carole Pretorius, N. P. (2009). Public Financial Management Reform Literature Review . London: London DFID.

Decreto do Governo N.º 19 /2022. (2022). CLASSIFICADORES ORÇAMENTAIS. Dili: Jornal da República.

K, L. Y. (2009). Handbook of Qualitative Research. (Edisi terjemahan oleh Daryatno, Badrus Syamsul Fata, Abi, dan John Rinaldi). . Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar.

Mahmudi. (2007). Manajemen Kinerja Sektor Publik. Yogyakarta: Sekolah Tinggi Ilmu Manajemen YKPN.

Mardiasmo. (2004). Akuntansi Sektor Publik (2 ed.). Yogyakarta.: Andi.

MoF. (2020). UU nomor 43/2020 tentang Organic Kementerian Keuangan (Orgânica Do Ministério Das Finanças) . Dili: MoF.

Nafarin , M. (2007). Penganggaran Perusahaan (3 ed.). Jakarta: Salemba Empat.

OECD. (2021). Anual Report 2021. OECD.

PEFA 2011 Framework. (2011). Public Financial ManagementPerformance Measurement Framework. Washington DC: PEFA Secretariat.

PFM reform 2022-2027. (2022). Timor-Leste Public Financial Reform 2022-2027 (1 ed.). Dili: Ministry of Finance Timor-Leste.

Rahayu, S. K. (2010). PERPAJAKAN INDONESIA: Konsep dan Aspek Formal. Yogyakarta: Graha Ilmu.

Sumanth, D. J. (1985). Produktivity an Management. New York: Mc. Graw Hill.

Supriyono. (2002). Akuntansi Biaya dan Akuntansi Manajemen. Yogyakarta: Fakultas Ekonomi UGM.

Sutawijaya , R. B. (2009). Asuhan Keperawatan Gawat Darurat. Yogyakarta: Aulia.

UU No 2/2022. (2022). Undang-Undang Anggaran Umum Negara dan Pengelolaan Keuangan Publik Timor-Leste. Dili: Kementerian Keuangan Timor-Leste.

William J. Bruns, J. a. (2006). Budgetary Control and Organization Structure (27 pages). Waterhouse Journal of Accounting Research, 27.

Working Papers. (2015). International Budget Partnership 2015. Annual Report.

Worthington R. (2013). Performance and Programme-Based Budgeting in Africa: A Status Report 2013. Budgeting Review, 35-41. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3057023

Yilmaz, M. S. (2008). Strengthening Local Government Budgeting and Accountability. The World Bank Policy Research Working Paper No. 4767.

Yin, R. K. (2000). Case Study Research: Design and Methods (Edisi Terjemahan M. Djauzi Mudzakir). . Jakarta: PT Raja Grafindo Persada.

Downloads

Published

2023-12-05

How to Cite

Cruz, M. C. da, Wiagustini, N. L. P., & Soares, A. D. C. (2023). Effectiveness and Efficiency of Implementation of Program-Based Budget and Budget Credibility. Journal of Digitainability, Realism & Mastery (DREAM), 2(12), 328–342. https://doi.org/10.56982/dream.v2i12.182