Effectiveness and Efficiency in Implementation of Program-Based Budgeting and Budget Credibility

Authors

  • Maria Catarina da Cruz Institute of Business (IOB), Timor-Leste
  • Ni Luh Putu Wiagustini Faculty of Economic and Business, Universitas Udayana, Indonesia
  • Augusto Da Conceiçao Soares Institute of Business (IOB), Timor-Leste

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.56982/dream.v2i12.192

Keywords:

Effectiveness, Efficiency and Credibility, Budget

Abstract

Full implementation of program-based budgeting has financial advantages over line-item budgeting. However, in the Timor-Leste Ministry of Finance this is not implemented effectively and efficiently and does not maintain the level of budgetary credibility. The main objective of the study was to assess the level of effectiveness, efficiency and credibility of the budget at the Ministry of Finance. For the purpose of achieving this objective, a quantitative descriptive analysis method was used. The result shows that the average budget absorption for 2018-2022 is not effective and the result was 78.12%, which means Less Effectiveness. The average level of efficiency rated 78.12%, which means Efficient. However, this does not mean that most programs or activities were successfully achieved, but rather because several situations faced at that time did not allow them to be well implemented. Meanwhile, budgetary credibility in the context of budget implementation was Less Credible, with average percentages of 78.12%. On the other hand, budget credibility in the context of budget ratification (addition or reduction), the average ratio was 5.99%, which means Less Credible over the five-year period. It is recommended that Ministry of Finance Timor-Leste should provide sufficient and timely training for the staffs, regular supervision and prepare performance report, staffs of the ministries should be committed in planning process of their respective budget.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...

References

Abdurahman , A. (11 de June de 2012). https://scholar.google.com/scholar?q=Abdurrahman,+2012)+anggaran+stabil&hl=pt-PT&as_sdt=0&as_vis=1&oi=scholart. Recuperado el December de 2022, de Proposal%20Tesis%20S2/References/Abdurahman%20Aliyi-PBP.pdf

Bastian, I. (2013). Sistem Akuntansi Sektor Publik. Jakarta: Erlangga.

Carole Pretorius, N. P. (2009). Public Financial Management Reform Literature Review . London: London DFID.

Decreto do Governo N.º 19 /2022. (2022). CLASSIFICADORES ORÇAMENTAIS. Dili: Jornal da República.

K, L. Y. (2009). Handbook of Qualitative Research. (Edisi terjemahan oleh Daryatno, Badrus Syamsul Fata, Abi, dan John Rinaldi). . Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar.

Mahmudi. (2007). Manajemen Kinerja Sektor Publik. Yogyakarta: Sekolah Tinggi Ilmu Manajemen YKPN.

Mardiasmo. (2004). Akuntansi Sektor Publik (2 ed.). Yogyakarta.: Andi.

MoF. (2020). UU nomor 43/2020 tentang Organic Kementerian Keuangan (Orgânica Do Ministério Das Finanças) . Dili: MoF.

Nafarin , M. (2007). Penganggaran Perusahaan (3 ed.). Jakarta: Salemba Empat.

OECD. (2021). Anual Report 2021. OECD.

PEFA 2011 Framework. (2011). Public Financial ManagementPerformance Measurement Framework. Washington DC: PEFA Secretariat.

PFM reform 2022-2027. (2022). Timor-Leste Public Financial Reform 2022-2027 (1 ed.). Dili: Ministry of Finance Timor-Leste.

Rahayu, S. K. (2010). PERPAJAKAN INDONESIA: Konsep dan Aspek Formal. Yogyakarta: Graha Ilmu.

Sumanth, D. J. (1985). Produktivity an Management. New York: Mc. Graw Hill.

Supriyono. (2002). Akuntansi Biaya dan Akuntansi Manajemen. Yogyakarta: Fakultas Ekonomi UGM.

Sutawijaya , R. B. (2009). Asuhan Keperawatan Gawat Darurat. Yogyakarta: Aulia.

UU No 2/2022. (2022). Undang-Undang Anggaran Umum Negara dan Pengelolaan Keuangan Publik Timor-Leste. Dili: Kementerian Keuangan Timor-Leste.

William J. Bruns, J. a. (2006). Budgetary Control and Organization Structure (27 pages). Waterhouse Journal of Accounting Research, 27.

Working Papers. (2015). International Budget Partnership 2015. Annual Report.

Worthington R. (2013). Performance and Programme-Based Budgeting in Africa: A Status Report 2013. Budgeting Review, 35-41. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3057023

Yilmaz, M. S. (2008). Strengthening Local Government Budgeting and Accountability. The World Bank Policy Research Working Paper No. 4767.

Yin, R. K. (2000). Case Study Research: Design and Methods (Edisi Terjemahan M. Djauzi Mudzakir). . Jakarta: PT Raja Grafindo Persada.

Downloads

Published

2023-12-07

How to Cite

Cruz, M. C. da, Wiagustini, N. L. P., & Soares, A. D. C. (2023). Effectiveness and Efficiency in Implementation of Program-Based Budgeting and Budget Credibility . Journal of Digitainability, Realism & Mastery (DREAM), 2(12), 527–542. https://doi.org/10.56982/dream.v2i12.192