Digital Creativity and Ethical Challenges: The Case of IoT in Creative Industries

Peng Lu Sen

doi:10.56982/dream.v2i02.113

Authors

Peng Lu Sen City University Malaysia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.56982/dream.v2i02.113

Keywords:

internet of things (IoT), creative industry, digital creativity, ethical implications, data privacy

Abstract

This paper aims to explore the ethical challenges emerging from the use of the Internet of Things (IoT) in the creative industries. As the application of IoT continues to grow, questions about data privacy, security, and intellectual property rights become paramount. By examining existing literature and industry examples, this paper presents a comprehensive overview of these ethical issues and suggests potential strategies for their mitigation.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...

References

Aldawood, H., & Skinner, G. (2019). Security approaches for the Internet of Things: Protecting IoT environments from cyber threat. Internet of Things, 100137.

Atzori, L., Iera, A., & Morabito, G. (2010). The Internet of Things: A survey. Computer Networks, 54(15), 2787-2805. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.comnet.2010.05.010

Belkhir, L., & Elmeligi, A. (2020). Assessing the impact of the Internet of Things (IoT) on the sustainability of the creative industry. Journal of Innovation and Entrepreneurship, 9(1), 1-19.

Boden, M., Bryson, J., Caldwell, D., Dautenhahn, K., Edwards, L., Kember, S., Newman, P., Parry, V., Pegman, G., Rodden, T., Sorrell, T., Wallis, M., Whitby, B., & Winfield, A. (2017). Principles of robotics: regulating robots in the real world. Connection Science, 29(2), 124-129. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/09540091.2016.1271400

Bughin, J., Chui, M., & Manyika, J. (2015). Bridging the gap: Reaping the benefits of the IoT in the creative industry. Digital McKinsey, 23-29.

Cavoukian, A. (2010). Privacy by Design: The 7 Foundational Principles. Information and Privacy Commissioner of Ontario, Canada.

Hargittai, E., & Marwick, A. (2016). "What Can I Really Do?" Explaining the Privacy Paradox with Online Apathy. International Journal of Communication, 10, 21.

Hilbert, M. (2016). The end justifies the definition: The manifold outlooks on the digital divide and their practical usefulness for policy-making. Telecommunications Policy, 40(6), 533-551.

Kuner, C. (2017). The European Union's General Data Protection Regulation: Toward a Property Regime for Protecting Data Privacy. Yale Journal of Law & Technology, 19(1), 1-32.

Mittelstadt, B., Allo, P., Taddeo, M., Wachter, S., & Floridi, L. (2016). The ethics of algorithms: Mapping the debate. Big Data & Society, 3(2), 1-21. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/2053951716679679

Raustiala, K., & Sprigman, C. (2019). The second digital disruption: Streaming & the dawn of data-driven creativity. California Law Review, 107, 1-33.

Roman, R., Zhou, J., & Lopez, J. (2013). On the features and challenges of security and privacy in distributed internet of things. Computer Networks, 57(10), 2266-2279. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.comnet.2012.12.018

Schroff, S. (2017). Intellectual property rights and the ever-evolving internet. Journal of Internet Law, 21(3), 3-13.

Van Dijk, J. A. (2017). Digital divide: Impact of access. In The International Encyclopedia of Media Effects. Wiley. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118783764.wbieme0043

Von Hippel, E., & von Krogh, G. (2006). Free revealing and the private-collective model for innovation incentives. R&D Management, 36(3), 295-306. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9310.2006.00435.x

Wang, P., De, S., & Chaudhury, A. (2015). A comprehensive survey on internet of things (IoT) toward 5G wireless systems. IEEE Internet of Things Journal, 2(3), 161-200.

Ziegeldorf, J. H., Morchon, O. G., & Wehrle, K. (2014). Privacy in the Internet of Things: Threats and challenges. Security and Communication Networks, 7(12), 2728-2742. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/sec.795

Zuboff, S. (2015). Big other: surveillance capitalism and the prospects of an information civilization. Journal of Information Technology, 30(1), 75-89. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/jit.2015.5