A Study on Academic Optimism on the Academic Achievement of Secondary Education School in China
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.56982/dream.v1i05.45Keywords:
academic optimism, academic achievement, ChinaAbstract
Finding the features of schools that lead to improved student accomplishment is one of the challenges that educational researchers, legislators, and school reformers face. The task at hand is unambiguous but challenging. Optimism and self-efficacy are a self-regulatory mechanism that influences students' academic behavior in academic settings because it affects how they perceive their own competence for a specific task and their capacity to adjust to and manage future academic demands. Higher self-efficacy students view homework as a task to be met with self-assurance and to put their skills into efficient and responsible practice. In an effort to address these concerns, this paper investigates the connections between students' academic optimism and their performance. Previous studies on academic optimism have been limited by their narrow focus on its defining traits; this approach may help remedy this. The research aims to shed light on the nature of academic optimism and the ways in which it manifests itself to improve teaching and learning and, by extension, to expand human understanding. The researcher selects the Theory of Planned Behavior in order to strengthen and support the entire body of study. The purpose of this article development and suggested framework on academic optimism and its relationship with student achievement in China's schools. The proposed study design is critical for subsequent analysis to confirm that both exogenous factors and endogenous factor were strongly related to the contingency of institutional efficiency can affect student progress.
Downloads
Metrics
References
Ajzen, I. 1988. Attitudes, personality, and behavior. Chicago: Dorsey Press.
Ajzen, I. 1987. Attitudes, traits, and actions: Dispositional prediction of behavior in personality and social psychology. In L. Berkowitz (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 20, pp. 1ó63). New York: Academic Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0065-2601(08)60411-6
Ajzen, I., & Fishbein, M. 1970. The prediction of behavior from attitudinal and normative variables. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 6, 466ó487. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-1031(70)90057-0
Bandura, A. 1997, Self-Efficacy: The Exercise of Control, Freeman, New York, NY.
Bandura, A. 1993. Perceived self-efficacy in cognitive development and functioning, Educational Psychologist, Vol. 28 No. 2, pp. 117-48. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1207/s15326985ep2802_3
Bryk, A.S. and Schneider, B. 2002, Trust in Schools: A Core Resource for Improvement, Russell Sage Foundation, New York, NY.
Bellibas, M. S., & Liu, Y. 2018. The effects of principals’ perceived instructional and distributed leadership practices on their perceptions of school climate. International Journal of Leadership in Education, 21(2), 226–244. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/13603124.2016.1147608
Boberg, J. E., & Bourgeois, S. J. 2016. The effects of integrated transformational leadership on achievement. Journal of Educational Administration, 54(3), 357–374 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/JEA-07-2014-0086
Carver, C.S. & Scheier, M.F. 2014. Dispositional optimism. Trends Cog. Sci. 2014, 18, 293–299 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2014.02.003
Chen, D., Ning, B., & Bos, W. 2022. Relationship between Principal Leadership Style and Student Achievement: A Comparative Study between Germany and China. SAGE Open, 12(2). https://doi.org/10.1177/21582440221094601 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/21582440221094601
Day, C., Gu, Q., & Sammons, P. 2016. The impact of leadership on student outcomes: How successful school leaders use transformational and instructional strategies to make a difference. Educational Administration Quarterly, 52(2), 221–258. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0013161X15616863
De Maeyer, S., Rymenans, R., Van Petegem, P., van Den Bergh, H., & Rijlaarsdam, G. 2007. Educational leadership and pupil achievement: The choice of a valid conceptual model to test effectsin school effectiveness research. School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 18(2), 125–145. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/09243450600853415
Fend, H. 2008. Neue Theorie der Schule: Einführung in das Verstehen von Bildungssystemen (New theory of the school: An introduction to understand education system). VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften
Fierro, S.; Almagro, B.J.; Sáenz-López, P. Necesidades psicológicas, motivación e inteligencia emocional en Educación Física. Rev. Elect. Inter. Form. Prof. 2019, 22, 167–186.
Goddard, R.D., Tschannen-Moran, M. and Hoy, W.K. 2001, Teacher trust in students and parents: a multilevel examination of the distribution and effects of teacher trust in urban elementary schools, Elementary School Journal, Vol. 102 No. 1, pp. 3-17. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1086/499690
Goddard, R.G., Hoy, W.K. & Woolfolk Hoy, A. (2000), “Collective teacher efficacy: its meaning, measure, and impact on student achievement”, American Educational Research Journal, Vol. 37 No. 2, pp. 479-508. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3102/00028312037002479
González, N.I. 2018. Autoestima, Optimismo y Resiliencia en Niños en Situación de Pobreza. Rev. Int. Psic. 2018, 16, 2–119. DOI: https://doi.org/10.33670/18181023.v16i01.261
Hoy, W.K. and Miskel, C.G. (2005), Educational Administration: Theory, Research, and Practice, 7th ed., McGraw-Hill, New York, NY.
Hoy, W.K. and Tschannen-Moran, M. (2003), “The conceptualization and measurement of faculty trust in schools”, in Hoy, W.K. and Miskel, C. (Eds), Studies in Leading and Organizing Schools, Information Age Publishers, Greenwich, CT, pp. 181-207.
Hoy, W.K. 2002, “Faculty trust: a key to student achievement”, Journal of School Public Relations, Vol. 23 No. 2, pp. 88-103. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3138/jspr.23.2.88
Hoy, W.K. and Tarter, C.J. (1997), The Road to Open and Healthy Schools: A Handbook for Change, 2nd ed., Corwin Press, Thousand Oaks, CA.
Knezevich, S. J. 1984. Administration of public education. New York: Harper & Row
Li, Y. 2020. Transformational School Leadership and Students' Gaokao Performance in China: A Multilevel Mediation Analysis. Graduate Theses and Dissertations. University of South Florida https://scholarcommons.usf.edu/etd/8556
Lee, D. H. L., & Chiu, C. S. 2017. School banding: Principals’ perspectives of teacher professional development in the school-based management context. Journal of Educational Administration, 55(6), 685–701. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/JEA-02-2017-0018
Leithwood, K., Harris, A., & Hopkins, D. 2020. Seven strong claims about successful school leadership revisited. School Leadership and Management, 40(1), 5–22. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/13632434.2019.1596077
Li, R. 2016. Shadow education in China: what is the relationship between private tutoring and students National College Entrance Examination (Gaokao) performance? (Doctoral Dissertation, Iowa State University).
Méndez, J. 2016. Autoconcepto académico y rendimiento académico en estudiantes de la Universidad de la Frontera: Análisis comparative por facultades. Rev. Invest. Educ. 2016, 26, 169–188
Pulido, F. & Herrera, F. 2019. Influencia de la felicidad en el rendimiento académico en primaria: Importancia de las variables sociode mográficas en un contexto pluricultural. Rev. Esp. Orien. Psicop. 2019, 30, 41–5 DOI: https://doi.org/10.5944/reop.vol.30.num.1.2019.25193
Rengiah, P. & Sentosa, I. 2016. Inclination of the Australian Indigenous Students in Obtaining Tertiary Education in Australian Universities. World Review of Business Research Vol. 6. No. 1. March 2016 Issue. Pp. 143 – 160.
Smith, Page & Hoy, Wayne. 2007. Academic optimism and student achievement in urban elementary schools. Journal of Educational Administration. 45. 556-568. 10.1108/09578230710778196. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/09578230710778196
Sun, J. P., Zhang, X., & Chen, X. 2018. Transformational leadership in Chinese schools: An analysis from the perspective of the Confucian idea of transformation. In J. E. Petrovic & R. M. Mitchell (Eds.), Indigenous philosophies of education around the world (pp. 105–126). Routledge. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315173603-6
Usán, P., Salavera, C. & Quílez-Robres, A. 2022. Self-Efficacy, Optimism, and Academic Performance as Psychoeducational Variables: Mediation Approach in Students. Children 2022, 9, 420. https://doi.org/10.3390/ children9030420 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/children9030420
Wutoy, M., Waruwu, E., Ndraha, A. B., & Al Hadad, A. 2022. Application of the Presidential Threshold Concept in the Presidential and Vice-Presidential Election System and its Impact on the Indonesian Constitutional System. Journal of Digitainability, Realism & Mastery (DREAM), 1(03), 46–55. https://doi.org/10.56982/journalo.v1i03.28 DOI: https://doi.org/10.56982/journalo.v1i03.28
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2022 Zhang Yue

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.


