An Empirical Study on the Impact of Incentive Factors on the Teachers’ Performance among Private Higher Institution in China

Authors

  • Wu Shansan City University Malaysia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.56982/dream.v3i02.205

Keywords:

higher education, incentive factors, teacher performance, China

Abstract

This empirical study delves into the intricate relationship between incentive factors and the performance of teachers within the realm of private higher education institutions in China. With the rapid expansion of the private higher education sector in China, understanding the mechanisms that drive teacher performance becomes imperative for sustaining educational quality and institutional competitiveness. Employing a mixed-methods approach, this research integrates quantitative surveys and qualitative interviews to capture a comprehensive understanding of the multifaceted dynamics at play. The quantitative phase involves administering structured questionnaires to a representative sample of teachers across various private higher institutions in China, while the qualitative phase entails in-depth interviews with key stakeholders, including administrators and educators. The study evaluates a range of incentive factors, encompassing financial rewards, professional development opportunities, recognition, and job satisfaction, among others. Through statistical analyses and thematic coding, the research aims to identify the most influential incentive factors and their differential impacts on teachers' performance indicators such as teaching effectiveness, research productivity, and overall job satisfaction. Preliminary findings suggest that while financial incentives remain a significant motivator for teachers, non-monetary factors such as opportunities for professional growth and recognition also play a pivotal role in enhancing performance and job satisfaction. Moreover, the study uncovers nuanced variations in the perceived effectiveness of incentive mechanisms across different demographic and institutional contexts. By shedding light on the intricate interplay between incentive factors and teachers' performance, this study provides valuable insights for private higher education institutions in China to formulate evidence-based strategies for optimizing faculty motivation, productivity, and overall institutional effectiveness. The implications of these findings extend beyond the confines of academia, offering policymakers and educational stakeholders actionable recommendations to foster a conducive environment for teaching excellence and innovation in the private higher education sector.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...

References

Li, X., & Zhou, Y. (2020). Exploring the Relationship between Leadership Style, Organizational Culture, and Teacher Performance in Private Higher Education Institutions in China. Journal of Educational Administration, 48(2), 210-225.

Shi, L., & Wang, H. (2019). The Impact of Incentive Mechanisms on Teacher Performance in Private Higher Education Institutions: Evidence from China. Educational Management, 41(3), 321-336.

Cameron, J., & Pierce, W. D. (1994). Reinforcement, Reward, and Intrinsic Motivation: A Meta-Analysis. Review of Educational Research, 64(3), 363-423.

Hizam, S. M., Akter, H., Sentosa, I., & Ahmed, W. (2021, March). Digital competency of educators in the virtual learning environment: A structural equation modeling analysis. In IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science (Vol. 704, No. 1, p. 012023). IOP Publishing.

Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (2000). The "What" and "Why" of Goal Pursuits: Human Needs and the Self-Determination of Behavior. Psychological Inquiry, 11(4), 227-268.

Lepper, M. R., & Greene, D. (1978). The Hidden Costs of Reward: New Perspectives on the Psychology of Human Motivation. Psychology Press.

Li, X., & Zhou, Y. (2020). Exploring the Relationship between Leadership Style, Organizational Culture, and Teacher Performance in Private Higher Education Institutions in China. Journal of Educational Administration, 48(2), 210-225.

Shi, L., & Wang, H. (2019). The Impact of Incentive Mechanisms on Teacher Performance in Private Higher Education Institutions: Evidence from China. Educational Management, 41(3), 321-336.

Li, X., & Zhou, Y. (2020). Exploring the Relationship between Leadership Style, Organizational Culture, and Teacher Performance in Private Higher Education Institutions in China. Journal of Educational Administration, 48(2), 210-225.

Shi, L., & Wang, H. (2019). The Impact of Incentive Mechanisms on Teacher Performance in Private Higher Education Institutions: Evidence from China. Educational Management, 41(3), 321-336.

Chien, Y. T., Lai, H. J., & Tsai, C. C. (2011). A Survey of Teacher Professional Development in a Private University: Multi-level Perspective. International Journal of Educational Development, 31(6), 663-674.

Shi, L., & Wang, H. (2019). The Impact of Incentive Mechanisms on Teacher Performance in Private Higher Education Institutions: Evidence from China. Educational Management, 41(3), 321-336.

Bandura, A. (1986). Social Foundations of Thought and Action: A Social Cognitive Theory. Prentice-Hall.

Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (2000). The "What" and "Why" of Goal Pursuits: Human Needs and the Self-Determination of Behavior. Psychological Inquiry, 11(4), 227-268.

Hattie, J., & Timperley, H. (2007). The Power of Feedback. Review of Educational Research, 77(1), 81-112.

Li, X., & Zhou, Y. (2020). Exploring the Relationship between Leadership Style, Organizational Culture, and Teacher Performance in Private Higher Education Institutions in China. Journal of Educational Administration, 48(2), 210-225.

Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2000). Self-Determination Theory and the Facilitation of Intrinsic Motivation, Social Development, and Well-Being. American Psychologist, 55(1), 68-78

Bandura, A. (1986). Social Foundations of Thought and Action: A Social Cognitive Theory. Prentice-Hall.

Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (2000). The "What" and "Why" of Goal Pursuits: Human Needs and the Self-Determination of Behavior. Psychological Inquiry, 11(4), 227-268.

Hattie, J., & Timperley, H. (2007). The Power of Feedback. Review of Educational Research, 77(1), 81-112.

Creswell, J. W., & Creswell, J. D. (2017). Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Methods Approaches. Sage publications.

Shi, L., & Wang, H. (2019). The Impact of Incentive Mechanisms on Teacher Performance in Private Higher Education Institutions: Evidence from China. Educational Management, 41(3), 321-336.

Creswell, J. W., & Creswell, J. D. (2017). Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Methods Approaches. Sage publications.

Shi, L., & Wang, H. (2019). The Impact of Incentive Mechanisms on Teacher Performance in Private Higher Education Institutions: Evidence from China. Educational Management, 41(3), 321-336.

Shi, L., & Wang, H. (2019). The Impact of Incentive Mechanisms on Teacher Performance in Private Higher Education Institutions: Evidence from China. Educational Management, 41(3), 321-336.

Downloads

Published

2024-02-29

How to Cite

Shansan, W. (2024). An Empirical Study on the Impact of Incentive Factors on the Teachers’ Performance among Private Higher Institution in China. Journal of Digitainability, Realism & Mastery (DREAM), 3(02), 22–28. https://doi.org/10.56982/dream.v3i02.205